Why the study?
The effect of RAAS blockers on contrast-induced nephropathy is unclear in patients with renal insufficiency.
Does the administration of RAAS blockers increase the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with renal insufficiency?
Does the administration of RAAS blockers increase the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with renal insufficiency?
Administration of RAAS blockers in patients with renal insufficiency is associated with a significantly higher incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy, supporting the practice of withholding these medications prior to contrast exposure.
Supports withholding ACEI/ARB before contrast in renal insufficiency; confirms elevated CIN risk.
The effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers] on Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is unclear in patients with renal insufficiency. Thus, we conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between the administration of RAAS blockers and CIN in patients with renal insufficiency. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for relevant studies published before September 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of CIN, and the secondary outcome was the changes in serum creatinine (SCr) from baseline to postprocedure (ΔSCr). Pooled odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with their 95% confidence interval (CIs) for the CIN incidence, ΔSCr were used to calculate original data. A total of 8 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with controls, ACEI/angiotensin receptor blocker increased the risk of CIN (OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.14-2.28, I = 30%; P = 0.007), whereas this association was not significant in Chinese patients (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.65-1.77, I = 19%, P = 0.79). The total weighted mean differences of the ΔSCr were 0.06 mg/dL (95% CI: 0.01-0.11, I = 82%; P = 0.03). Administration of RAAS blockers in patients with renal insufficiency was associated with a significantly higher incidence of CIN, whereas it did not show a significant effect on Chinese patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: