Why the study?
Does off-pump CABG improve right ventricular function compared to on-pump CABG in patients with normal left ventricular function undergoing CABG?
Does off-pump CABG improve right ventricular function compared to on-pump CABG in patients with normal left ventricular function undergoing CABG?
Off-pump CABG does not provide better preservation of right ventricular function compared to on-pump CABG, as both techniques result in similar early impairment and recovery by 6 months.
Off-pump CABG confers no right ventricular advantage over on-pump; challenges assumptions of superior myocardial protection with off-pump techniques.
BACKGROUND: Off-pump CABG (OPCABG) results in better preservation of left ventricular function in the perioperative period than conventional on-pump CABG (ONCABG); however, evidence is conflicting as to the effect of OPCABG and ONCABG on right ventricular (RV) function, possibly because of the complexity involved in measuring this. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a single-center randomized pilot study, 60 patients with normal left ventricular function undergoing CABG were randomly assigned to OPCABG or ONCABG. Patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imagine for assessment of RV function preoperatively, early postoperatively, and at 6 months after surgery. Fifty-one patients completed the first 2 scans, and 47 completed all 3 scans. Preoperative characteristics and RV function did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (mean+/-SD): RV stroke volume index was 49+/-10 mL/m(2) for OPCABG and 49+/-16 mL/m(2) for ONCABG. After surgery, RV stroke volume index fell to 36+/-7 mL/m(2) in the OPCABG group and 39+/-11 mL/m(2) in the ONCABG group, but this did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P=0.41). All markers of RV function recovered to preoperative levels by 6 months, with no long-term difference between the surgical techniques. CONCLUSIONS: RV function is impaired early after surgery but recovers by 6 months. The changes were similar in both the OPCABG and ONCABG groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pegg et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: