Cohort study reveals comparable early ejection fraction gains after off-pump and beating-heart bypass in coronary disease patients, indicating both techniques preserve cardiac recovery.
OBJECTIVE: Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) and beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting (BH-CAB) performed with cardiopulmonary bypass support are used with increasing frequency in the treatment of coronary artery occlusive disease. The utility of OPCAB and BH-CAB in treating high-risk patients has been studied, but the effects of these procedures on ventricular function have not been thoroughly investigated. METHODS: Data were collected from a database encompassing all patients who underwent isolated coronary revascularization performed by a single surgeon between August 2002 and March 2007. All procedures (n = 507) began as OPCAB operations, but 99 were converted to BH-CAB during surgery. Each patient's ejection fraction (EF) was measured preoperatively and postoperatively (median, 5.0 days after surgery). RESULTS: We found that although the BH-CAB patients tended to be in worse health and to have a lower preoperative EF than the OPCAB patients, both groups of patients had similar improvements in postoperative EF (6.8% vs 5.4%; p = 0.65). In addition, multivariable linear regression showed that a lower preoperative EF, age ≥ 70 years, and cardiomegaly predicted less postoperative EF improvement after coronary revascularization by either OPCAB or BH-CAB. CONCLUSIONS: Both OPCAB and BH-CAB procedures produce significant and similar short-term improvement in EF in patients with coronary disease. This change in EF may account for the subjective clinical improvements seen early after both procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Letsou et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: