Why the study?
To compare early and medium outcomes between on-pump beating-heart and off-pump CABG in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction.
Does on-pump beating-heart CABG improve outcomes compared to off-pump CABG in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction?
Does on-pump beating-heart CABG improve outcomes compared to off-pump CABG in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction?
On-pump beating-heart CABG is a safe and acceptable alternative to off-pump CABG in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction, providing better early postoperative LVEF improvement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OPBH CABG was associated with better midterm MACE-free survival than OPCABG in moderate LV dysfunction; leaves open need for randomized trials.
Aim: To compare the early and medium outcomes of on-pump beating-heart (OPBH) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and off-pump CABG (OPCABG) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 30% and 40%. Material & Methods: This study was conducted as a retrospective observation over a period of 1 year at the Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.130 patients were selected for this study. All patients were divided into 2 groups, according to the revascularization method: OPCABG group and OPBH group. Results: LVEF before discharge significantly improved from 34.39 ± 4.21 to 44.27 ± 7.29 in the OPBH group and from 34.27±4.61 to 42.66 ± 8.20in the OPCABG group (P<0.001). All survival patients have been echocardiographically examined after 6 months which showed a significant higher early postoperative LVEF in the OPBH group than in the OPCABG group (45.28 ± 6.10 versus 44.42 ± 7.08%, respectively; P=0.002). Conclusion: The OPBH technique was a safe and an acceptable alternative for surgical revascularization in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction which provided better midterm MACE-free survival compared with OPCABG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: