Why the study?
Pacemakers are generally well tolerated, so clinicians may not be exposed to uncommon potential complications such as pacemaker lead migration.
Highlights a rare complication of pacemaker lead migration and right ventricular perforation presenting as an open chest wound.
Clinicians should consider lead migration in pacemaker patients with chest wounds; this case leaves open questions on incidence and prevention.
Pacemakers are commonly utilized in clinical practice and are generally well tolerated; therefore, clinicians may not be exposed to potential complications associated with pacemakers. This case report aims to illustrate the clinical presentation of a pacemaker lead migration, an uncommon potential complication. We present an 83-year-old male with a past medical history of complete atrioventricular block managed with a permanent pacemaker who presented with an open wound on his right chest. He had capped, abandoned right-sided leads from a previous pacemaker. At presentation, there was blood-tinged, yellow drainage and visible erosion of his electrodes. Computed tomography showed the right ventricular pacing lead perforating the right ventricle. Pacemaker lead migration outside of the chest wall is rare. Perforations may present asymptomatically or strikingly with effusions, pneumothoraces, hemothoraces, or cardiac tamponade. Management options include lead repositioning or extraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmoud et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: