Why the study?
Neurologic emergencies in pregnancy carry extreme risk of permanent injury, requiring obstetric clinicians to recognize risk factors, symptoms, and physiological changes to provide prompt evaluation and early intervention.
Early and aggressive interventions for individuals with neurologic events during pregnancy and postpartum are critical to improve outcomes for both the patient and the fetus.
Prompt evaluation of neurologic emergencies in pregnancy may improve outcomes; leaves open standardized protocols from higher-level evidence.
Neurologic emergencies in pregnancy require prompt evaluation and early, focused intervention to improve neurologic outcomes for the affected person and to avoid further injury. Neurologic events in pregnancy, although rare, present a time of extreme risk of permanent injury for the person who is pregnant. Therefore, obstetric clinicians should be well versed in the risk factors for potential neurologic events and understand the symptoms and events that should prompt evaluation for a neurologic event. In addition, they should support other specialties in aggressive and early neurologic care for the patient to improve outcomes while assessing fetal well-being and care optimization for the dyad. Obstetric clinicians can uniquely provide knowledge of changes in pregnancy physiology that can increase the risk of neurologic events, as well as change the treatment of these events. For all patients with neurologic events, "time is brain." Therefore, it is important to be aware of changes in common presenting pregnancy concerns that should prompt evaluation for other pathogeneses. Finally, pregnancy care teams should be prepared to begin the initial stabilization and management of acute neurologic emergencies, including seizure, stroke, and meningitis, while seeking aid from other medical and neurologic specialists who can support their care and interventions. Early and aggressive interventions for individuals with neurologic events during pregnancy and postpartum are critical to the overall well-being of the dyad.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wesley et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: