Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The constitutive equation for Frenkel exciton polarization in a bounded medium is derived from both macroscopic Lagrangian theory and microscopic coherent-wave theory. The result corresponds to the Hopfield and Thomas model previously thought to apply to the Wannier exciton. We show that the Frenkel exciton must be regarded as a finite-volume object and so the change of the exciton binding energy near a surface must be included in the optics problem of transmission/reflection near its resonance (the so-called additional boundary condition or ABC problem). The combination of the exciton polarization equation and the wave equation is then solved by a new mathematical method in wave-vector space (k space). We show that the truly macroscopic nonlocal susceptibility must contain surface terms that previous macroscopic theories did not include. We obtain a different solution to the problem with this theory that requires no boundary conditions. By transforming to real space, we also derive the ABC needed for a macroscopic real-space approach and point out the important (but often confused) difference between macroscopic and microscopic boundary conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: