Summary This paper describes a three-dimensional (3D), three-phase, black-oil model being used to simulate naturally fractured reservoirs. The program is fully implicit and can perform single-porosity, dual-porosity, or dual-permeability computations. Sample simulations are presented to illustrate the differences between the three computational techniques. Single-porosity recoveries are much larger than the recoveries predicted by the dual techniques. The dual-permeability, primary-depletion recoveries are very similar to the dual-porosity, primary-depletion recoveries, while the dual-permeability waterflood recoveries are significantly larger than the dual-porosity waterflood recoveries. Pseudocapillary pressures are generated from fine-grid, single-matrix block studies. The pseudocapillary pressures are then used in the dual-porosity simulations to account for fluid distributions in the matrix and fracture systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dean et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: