Why the study?
Does intravenous AH-1058 alter electrophysiological and hemodynamic parameters in an in vivo canine model?
Does intravenous AH-1058 alter electrophysiological and hemodynamic parameters in an in vivo canine model?
AH-1058 demonstrates properties of a slow-acting cardioselective calcium channel blocker in vivo, suppressing cardiac electrophysiology and hemodynamics without affecting vascular resistance.
May support cardioselective calcium channel blockade in canines; leaves open human translation and therapeutic testing.
AH-1058 (4-(5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5-ylidene)-1-[(£)-3-(3-methoxy-2-nitro)phenyl-2-propenyl]piperidine hydrochloride) is a novel calcium channel blocker whose chemical structure is quite different from those of typical calcium channel blockers. In this study, electrophysiological and hemodynamic effects of AH-1058 were assessed in the halothane-anesthetized, closed-chest canine model. Intravenous administration of a canine antiarrhythmic dose of 100μg/kg of AH-1058 (n = 6) did not affect the cardiovascular variables, except that the cardiac output was decreased at 30 min after the drug administration. Additional administration of 200μg/kg of AH-1058 (n = 6) suppressed the sinus nodal automaticity, AV nodal conduction and ventricular contraction and decreased the mean blood pressure, cardiac output and double product. The effects gradually appeared, while no change was detected in the intraventricular conduction, ventricular repolarization period, ventricular effective refractory period, preload to the left ventricle and total peripheral vascular resistance during the observation period of 30 min. The cardiosuppressive effects of AH-1058 can be explained by its calcium channel blocking action demonstrated in a previous in vitro experiment, while the lack of the effect on the vascular resistance would suggest that AH-1058 may become a slow-acting cardioselective calcium channel blocker.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahara et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: