Distance estimators of density may exhibit serious bias unless the population under consideration forms a completely random spatial pattern, i.e. the estimators are not robust. In this paper some new estimators are proposed, and their robustness is assessed analytically against two stochastic models, which together embrace a continuous range of spatial pattern, from extreme regularity, through randomness, to extreme aggregation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter J. Diggle (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: