Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The oxymercuriation-demercuriation (OM–DM) of methyl (E)-communate with mercury(II) acetate yielded mainly the hydration product of the 14,15-double bond. The isopimarane oxide methyl (8R,12R)-epoxyisopimar-15-en-19-oate, the endoperoxide methyl (8S,12R,13S)-13,17-epidioxy-8,12-epoxylabd-14-en-19-oate and the diorganomercurial bis-(4β-methoxycarbonyl-19-norlabda- 8,12E-14-trien-17-yl)mercury were also obtained when NaBH4–NaOH was used as the reducing agent. The organomercurial regenerated methyl (E)-communate on prolonged treatment with NaBH4 in excess. The OM–DM of methyl (E)-communate using Na(Hg) as the reducing agent achieved partial isomerization of the 8(17)-double bond, giving methyl 1 4-hydroxylabda-8,1 2E-dien- 1 9-oate and methyl labda-8,12E,14-trien-19-oate; the oxide methyl (8S,12R)-8,12-epoxylabd-13E-en-19-oate, instead of the aforementioned isopimarene oxide, endoperoxide, and diorganomercurial; relatively important amounts of the product of stereoselective 1,4-addition, methyl (12R)-12-hydroxylabda-8(17),13E-dien-19-oate, and the hydration product of the 8(17)-double bond on the (a priori) most hindered, β side, methyl (8S)-8-hydroxylabda-12E,14-dien-19-oate. Besides these, small amounts of the doublehydration product methyl (8S)-8,14-dihydroxylabd-12E-en-19-oate were also obtained. Finally, methyl (Z)-communate 2 showed similar behaviour to its E-isomer in OM–DM reactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barrero et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: