Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction The histological pattern of pseudo-epitheliomatous hyperplasia (PEH) may be encountered in a large series of verruciform/crateriform skin lesions (VC) with or without central ulceration/crusting. Beside neoplastic and inflammatory processes, this clinico-histological pattern may be associated with an extensive range of infectious agents. Materials and Methods A literature search was performed to identify viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitic mucocutaneous infections potentially presenting with a clinical/histological VC-PEH pattern. Results A VC-PEH pattern was reported in parasitic (n=5), viral (n=6), bacterial (n=10), and fungal (n=12) mucocutaneous infections. The infection-linked VC-PEH pattern was typically linked to longstanding mucocutaneous processes. The human papillomavirus (HPV) family, Epstein-Barr virus, poxvirus, and polyomavirus-linked VC-PEH patterns seem to act as direct triggers of keratinocytic hyperproliferation whereas the VC-PEH patterns observed during other viral, parasitic, bacterial and fungal infections probably represent a reactive pattern of the epidermis to chronic mucocutaneous infections. The VC-PEH pattern was also more frequently reported in immunocompromised compared to immunocompetent patients. The risk of the development of a cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in chronic VC-PEH should not be overlooked. Conclusion In the event of longstanding, slowly progressing, isolated, or more profuse VC-PEH skin lesions, a thorough search for infectious agents should be considered, particularly in the immunocompromised patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delahaye et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: