Why the study?
Does longer residential distance increase total ischaemic time in STEMI patients referred for primary PCI?
Does longer residential distance increase total ischaemic time in STEMI patients referred for primary PCI?
Referral via field triage in the ambulance prevents significant increases in total ischaemic time for STEMI patients living at longer distances (up to 90 km) from a PCI center, compared to referral via non-PCI spoke centers.
Ambulance triage may mitigate distance-related ischaemic delays in STEMI; extends observational data but leaves open prospective confirmation.
AIMS: To evaluate the relation between residential distance and total ischaemic time in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: STEMI patients were transported to the Isala Hospital Zwolle with the intention to perform primary percutaneous coronary intervention PCI (pPCI) from 2004 until 2010 (n = 4149). Of these, 1424 patients (34 %) were referred via a non-PCI 'spoke' centre ('spoke' patients) and 2725 patients (66 %) were referred via field triage in the ambulance (ambulance patients). RESULTS: A longer residential distance increased median total ischaemic time in 'spoke' patients (0-30 km: 228 min, >30-60 km: 235 min, >60-90 km: 264 min, p < 0.001), however not in ambulance patients (0-30 km: 179 min, >30-60 km: 175 min, >60-90 km: 186 min, p = 0.225). After multivariable linear regression analysis, in 'spoke' patients residential distance of >30-60 km compared with 0-30 km was not independently associated with ischaemic time; however, a residential distance of >60-90 km (exp (B) = 1.11, 95 % CI 1.01-1.12) compared with 0-30 km was independently related with ischaemic time. In ambulance patients, residential distance of >30-60 and >60-90 km compared with 0-30 km was not independently associated with ischaemic time. CONCLUSION: A longer distance from the patient's residence to a PCI centre was associated with a small but significant increase in time to treatment in 'spoke' patients, however not in ambulance patients. Therefore, referral via field triage in the ambulance did not lead to a significant increase in time to treatment, especially at long distances (up to 90 km).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Postma et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: