Panel data analysis reveals student performance differences across voucher schools, indicating disparities stem from resource allocation rather than ownership structure.
This note examines whether for-profit management affects educational outcomes in Chile’s voucher system. Using administrative panel data for all voucher-subsidised primary schools from 2010 to 2014, we compare for-profit and nonprofit schools in terms of inputs and student performance. For-profit schools serve more disadvantaged students and rely on lower-cost inputs, such as less-qualified teachers, but they also provide more instructional hours and smaller classes. After controlling for student characteristics, a significant performance gap remains, but it is largely explained by differences in school inputs rather than by ownership form itself. These results suggest that for-profit management affects educational outcomes primarily through differences in input choices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boggiano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: