Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Crossover study demonstrates distinct electrophysiological biomarkers of sleep loss in healthy men, indicating their predictive utility for cognitive and driving impairment.
Acute and accumulated sleep loss differently impair alertness and cognition, yet context-aware biomarkers remain elusive. We applied interpretable machine learning to multimodal physiological data collected under controlled conditions to identify reliable biomarkers. In a within-participant, cross-over design, 47 healthy men (mean age: 23.7 ± 2.8 years) underwent 5-min waking electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings with eyes open after normal sleep (8 h sleep opportunity), sleep restriction (four nights, 6 h sleep opportunity), and acute total sleep deprivation (0 h sleep opportunity). Recordings included six EEG derivations, and simultaneous heart rate and eye-movement data. A subsample (n = 20) completed subjective sleepiness assessments, psychomotor vigilance tests, and a 22-min immersive driving simulation with EEG monitoring.,Classification models using participant-stratified cross-validation achieved 75% accuracy in distinguishing normal sleep from total deprivation despite varied timepoints and cognitive loads. Key EEG features included frontal theta, alpha and beta power, fronto-central mutual information, and a novel biomarker, frontal Hilbert envelope root mean square of successive differences, indicative of altered cortical excitability. Consistent with differential cognitive impairments, sleep restriction showed a distinct physiological signature compared to control and sleep deprivation, particularly in eye movements and heart rate variability. Importantly, the top-10 features showed subjective and behavioral relevance, explaining up to 37% of the variance in subjective sleepiness, vigilant attention and driving performance.,In conclusion, findings demonstrate the feasibility of interpretable machine learning for identifying electrophysiology-based biomarkers of sleep-related cognitive impairment and underscore the need for diverse samples and tasks to enhance generalizability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stucky et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: