Qualitative study identifies core elements of non-verbal access aesthetics, suggesting that silent participatory formats can inadvertently exclude diverse sensory and movement needs.
Despite growing attention to access aesthetics in disability studies, its development for non-verbal communication preferences, particularly for learning-disabled audiences, remains underexplored. This study examines non-verbal access aesthetics in Tactile Talk (2022), a non-disabled participatory performance by Katrien Oosterlinck. Through interviews and observations of all participants, five elements are identified: challenging able-bodied performer norms, highlighting embodied knowledge, elevating sensory objects, mirroring crip communication, and prioritising interaction over narrative. By establishing these elements, Tactile Talk’s silent access aesthetics, in turn, excludes certain movements, senses, and interpretations, highlighting the need for future research into diverse sensory and dramaturgical approaches for learning-disabled audiences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verbeke et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: