Population genetic analysis uncovers four distinct lineages and high morphological overlap in Quercus petraea complex, indicating insufficient divergence to justify separate species.
This study investigated the genetic and morphological variability of critical populations of Quercus petraea s.l. in southern Europe considering taxonomic and biogeographical issues. Ten EST-SSR markers were applied on sixteen populations of Q. petraea s.l., including Q. petraea subsp. petraea , Q. petraea subsp. austrotyrrhenica , Q. dalechampii auct non Ten, and Q. banatus , to assess genetic variation within and among populations using specific indices. Genetic structure was analysed using Bayesian clustering. Eight populations of potentially interfertile white oaks such as Q. pubescens (5) and Q. robur (3) were included in the overall dataset (24 populations) for comparison. Multivariate analysis procedures were applied to analyse genetic relationships among populations. The morphological variability of oak individuals was assessed only on the Q. petraea s.l. populations based on traits observed in leaves, twigs, and acorns. The patterns of covariation between morphological traits, taxonomic identity, and the geographical distribution of sessile oak populations were also investigated. The analysis on the overall dataset revealed four main genetic clusters for Q. petraea s.l.: one of possible ancestral origin, one occurring mainly in the Balkans, one spread across southern Italy, and one distributed primarly in western and central Europe. From a morphometric perspective, only a few leaf morphological traits exhibited variation trends correlated with the genetic structure pattern. Considerable overlap was found among populations within the Q. petraea collective group from both the genetic and morphological side. The variability observed was insufficient to distinguish species other than Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. (i.e. Q. dalechampii auct. non Ten., Q. banatus Kučera). However, all Q. petraea s.l. populations were found to be clearly distinguishable from the Q. robur subsp. robur and Q. pubescens subsp. pubescens populations included in the dataset as outgroups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pietro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: