Key result
Admission blood lactate shows no independent link to in-hospital death or treatment escalation in AHF.
Why the study?
Hyperlactatemia is commonly encountered in acute heart failure, but its underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
Does admission blood lactate level correlate with congestion indices and predict adverse outcomes in normotensive patients with acute heart failure?
Observational (n=225)
No
Does admission blood lactate level correlate with congestion indices and predict adverse outcomes in normotensive patients with acute heart failure?
Odds Ratio: 1.13 (95% CI 0.91–1.3)
Absolute Event Rate: 17.3% vs 5.1%
p-value: p=0.180
In normotensive patients with acute heart failure, admission blood lactate is frequently elevated but correlates poorly with congestion indices and does not independently predict in-hospital adverse outcomes.
Admission lactate shows limited utility for congestion assessment or prognosis in acute HF; leaves open its mechanistic role pending prospective data.
Introduction: Hyperlactatemia is commonly encountered in acute heart failure, but its mechanisms remain unclear. We aimed to explore the association between admission lactate and markers of congestion and adverse outcomes Methods: We retrospectively screened patients with acute heart failure who were admitted to the Internal Cardiology department and the Interventional Cardiology department at a teaching hospital. We assessed congestion indices: composite congestion score (CCS), estimated plasma volume status (ePVS), congestion score index (CSI) and NT-proBNP. Composite adverse outcomes were defined as treatment escalation or death. Results: We enrolled 225 patients with median age of 73 (65–83) years with ejection fraction of 39.0 (30.7–54.7) %. Median admission lactate was 1.8 (1.3–2.5) mmol/L with 87 patients had lactate concentration ≥2 mmol/L (38.7%). At admission, median values of congestion markers were CCS 6 (5–8) points, ePVS 5.5 (4.4–6.6), CSI 2 (1.3–3) points and NT-proBNP 7449 (3568–14447) pg/ml. Adverse outcomes occurred in 22 patients (9.8%). There was a weak correlation between lactate and CCS (r = 0.15, p = 0.022), ePVS (r = -0.26, p < 0.001) but not with CSI (r = -0.06, p = 0.340) and NT-proBNP (r = 0.1, p = 0.150). In multivariable analysis, CCS (OR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.04 – 1.79), log-transformed NT-proBNP (OR=2.30; 95% CI: 1.28 – 4.42) were independently associated with adverse outcomes but not admission lactate (OR=1.13, 95% CI: 0.91 – 1.30). Conclusion: In acute heart failure, blood lactate showed weak and discordant associations with different systemic congestion indices but was not associated with pulmonary congestion or adverse outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Le et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute heart failure (n=225). Admission blood lactate vs. Normal lactate levels was evaluated on Composite of in-hospital mortality or clinical deterioration requiring intensive treatment (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.91-1.30, p=0.180). In patients with acute heart failure, admission blood lactate was not independently associated with the composite adverse outcome of in-hospital mortality or treatment escalation (OR 1.13, p=0.180).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: