Cross-sectional study reveals equal project funding and coordination despite lower publication rates among female oral health scientists, highlighting persistent productivity disparities.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse gender equity in research funding and project coordination among researchers in Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine (OP/OM) in Brazil. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analysed publicly available data from members of the Brazilian Society of Stomatology and Oral Pathology. Curricula were accessed via the Lattes Platform. Researchers with < 5 years post-PhD or no registered research projects were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 133 researchers. Extracted variables included gender, scientific production, number of projects, funded projects, collaborative roles and project coordination. RESULTS: Women comprised 55.6% of the sample. Male researchers had significantly higher mean total career publications (158.80 vs. 99.59; p = 0.008) and more publications in Journal Citation Reports-indexed journals (74.08 vs. 46.95; p = 0.005). However, no significant gender differences were found in mean number of research projects developed (22.15 vs. 21.37; p = 0.601), funded projects (5.69 vs. 7.08; p = 0.714), projects coordinated (13.46 vs. 14.66; p = 0.996), or collaborative participations (8.69 vs. 6.71; p = 0.265). CONCLUSION: Despite women constituting most researchers in Brazilian OP/OM, significant gender disparities persist in scientific output metrics. Conversely, access to research funding and project leadership opportunities appears equitable, highlighting the need to address barriers affecting women's publication rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliveira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: