Review demonstrates sustainable feedstock strategies and dynamic networks in additive manufacturing, highlighting pathways toward circular 3D printing.
Additive manufacturing has revolutionized polymer material engineering, yet it remains heavily reliant on petroleum-based polymers and non-recyclable thermosets, particularly in vat-photopolymerization. This review evaluates the ongoing transition toward sustainable 3D printing and identifies a critical “functionalization paradox”: the chemical modifications required to make bio-derived feedstocks printable often increase their carbon footprint and compromise their inherent biodegradability. Herein, we categorize sustainable materials through a two-pronged circularity roadmap. First, after reviewing bio-based functionalized monomers, we review inherently reactive bio-monomers, such as lipoic acid derivatives, which bypass synthetic modification to enable rapid polymerization and closed-loop chemical depolymerization. Second, we review covalent adaptable networks (CANs) as a potential solution for thermosets that require synthetic functionalization, providing a pathway to reprocessability. Finally, we conclude that achieving truly circular 3D printing requires a fundamental shift in design philosophy: moving from the functionalization of biomass to the exploration of natural molecular architecture and dynamic network topologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jarach et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: