Experimental study demonstrates altered wave-V latency and amplitude during simultaneous multiband ABR in normal-hearing adults, suggesting enhanced frequency place specificity.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated changes in auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave-V morphology when multiple ABRs were recorded simultaneously using MultiBand ABR, compared with the traditional method of consecutive stimulus presentation. DESIGN: ABRs were elicited using narrow-band (NB) CE-Chirps centered at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, presented at clinical discharge levels and 10 dB above these levels. Both simultaneous and consecutive presentation modes were conducted at a nominal rate of 40 stimuli per second for each NB CE-Chirp. A total of 24 young participants with normal hearing were included, resulting in data from 48 ears at the discharge level and 20 participants (40 ears) at discharge level +10 dB. RESULTS: In the consecutive presentation mode, ABR wave-V morphology exhibited typical mean latency and amplitude characteristics for each NB CE-Chirp at both discharge level and discharge level +10 dB. However, in the simultaneous recording condition, ABRs demonstrated significantly longer wave-V latencies for the 500 and 1000 Hz stimuli at discharge level, and for the 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz stimuli at discharge level +10 dB, compared with the consecutive presentation. Furthermore, at both discharge and discharge level +10 dB, wave-V amplitudes were significantly reduced for all NB CE-Chirp stimulus frequencies in the simultaneous mode compared with the consecutive mode. Within-session test-retest evaluations were performed for the simultaneous presentation at discharge level, revealing no significant differences in wave-V amplitude or latency between the two recordings. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the hypothesis of a partial masking effect on the compound neural response to the target NB CE-Chirp caused by the presence of the adjacent off-frequency stimuli, suggesting a potential increase in ABR place specificity when using the simultaneous presentation method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kristensen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: