Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 23, 2025Journal of Audiology & OtologyOpen Access

Latency Characteristics of Auditory Brainstem Responses to Click and LS CE-Chirp Stimuli Under Monaural and Binaural Conditions

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SLSungmin Lee

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis of auditory brainstem response latencies in 21 young adults indicates LS CE-chirp stimuli enhance central auditory processing.

Key Points

  • LS CE-chirp stimuli elicited longer wave V latencies under binaural conditions, highlighting its impact.
  • Among 21 young adults, click-evoked ABRs showed no significant differences across presentation modes.
  • Auditory brainstem response testing utilized both click and LS CE-chirp stimuli under monaural and binaural conditions.
  • Improved detectability of ABRs with LS CE-chirp suggests advanced assessments of binaural integration.

Cite This Study

Sungmin Lee (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f9a0eb8ea8f2f37ee94b33https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2025.00220
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Binaural interaction in human auditory brainstem and middle-latency responses affected by sound frequency band, lateralization predictability, and attended modality2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Binaural Interaction Component and Behavioral Auditory Processing in the Elderly with Hearing Loss: Preliminary Study2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal-hearing subjects2008 · 157 citations
  4. 4Optimizing Auditory Brainstem Response Test with Narrow Band Level-Specific CE-Chirps2022 · 6 citations
  5. 5The Physiological Basis and Clinical Use of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response2016 · 83 citations