Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative study reveals stimulus rate and sound type alter auditory brainstem responses in infants and adults, highlighting distinct clinical dynamics for chirp stimuli.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of click and CE-Chirp stimulus rate on auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) in infants and adults. Traditional clinical measures were used to examine the responses. Also, the ABR time-frequency characteristics were explored using automated feature engineering. METHOD: ABRs were recorded from 37 infant ears and in 39 young adults. ABRs were recorded for both click and CE-Chirp stimuli at 70 dB nHL for different rates (23.3/s, 53.3/s, and 83.3/s). RESULTS: Across all rates, both click and CE-Chirp-evoked ABRs showed similar Peak I latencies in infants and adults; however, Peak III and V latencies varied. Click-evoked ABRs were earlier in latencies when compared to CE-Chirp-evoked ABRs in both groups, whereas CE-Chirp-evoked ABRs were larger in amplitude compared to click-evoked ABRs. Stimulus-type-dependent changes in the absolute ABR latencies were observed as the stimulus rate was increased. The ABR time-frequency characteristics varied with stimulus rate and were dependent on the feature extraction method applied. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of click stimulus rate on ABRs in infants and adults demonstrated in this study agrees with published literature, but our findings with the CE-Chirp do not. Audiologists and researchers should be aware of differences in ABRs due to the effect of stimulus type and rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veeranna et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: