Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial reveals adding danvatirsen to pembrolizumab does not improve response rates in head and neck cancer, indicating limited benefit from this combination.
PURPOSE: STAT3 is important in promoting a pro-oncogenic tumor microenvironment. This first randomized trial of a STAT3-targeting ASO with pembrolizumab assessed whether this first-line combination would improve outcomes compared with pembrolizumab alone in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled study (NCT05814666) enrolled patients with previously untreated R/M-HNSCC with positive PD-L1 expression (combined positive score [CPS] ≥1). Patients were stratified by CPS (1-19; ≥20) and randomized 2:1 to danvatirsen 3mg/kg IV weekly (with 2 loading doses in week 1) plus pembrolizumab 200mg IV every 3 weeks or pembrolizumab alone. Patients received 21-day treatment cycles until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or voluntary withdrawal. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR: partial + complete response per RECIST-v1.1). RESULTS: 69 patients were randomized and 66 treated (51 [77.3%] male), 45 with danvatirsen + pembrolizumab, 21 with pembrolizumab alone. Enrolment was stopped due to lack of response in the CPS 1-19 cohort after ≥1 scan (~6 weeks of treatment) and in the CPS ≥20 cohort after ≥2 scans (~12 weeks). In the final analysis, ORRs were 15.6% and 14.3%, respectively (risk difference 1.3, P=1.0). The treatment-emergent adverse-event rate was increased in the combination arm (97.8% vs 85.7%), and the combination side effect profile was similar to previous danvatirsen studies. CONCLUSIONS: Combination danvatirsen + pembrolizumab did not improve ORR compared to pembrolizumab alone in first-line treatment of R/M-HNSCC. Further exploration of STAT3-targeted approaches is needed within the context of immunotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saba et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: