Randomized trial reveals limited benefits of group-based peer support on well-being and foot care in type 2 diabetes, suggesting a need for improved participant engagement strategies.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a group-based peer support intervention for individuals with type 2 diabetes, focusing on diabetes-related distress, self-care, well-being, and health-related quality of life. In this randomized controlled trial, participants were allocated to either a group-based peer support intervention—consisting of six sessions led by peer leaders and psychotherapists—or a single educational meeting. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, six months, and twelve months using self-reported questionnaires. Differences between the intervention and control groups were analyzed using linear multilevel models. Out of 1,404 individuals with type 2 diabetes who were invited, 269 (19.2%) expressed willingness to participate, and 225 (16.0%) completed the baseline questionnaire and were enrolled. Participants who consented generally had higher educational levels. Among those in the intervention group, 62.7% attended three or more sessions. The intervention led to improved well-being (0.99; 95%CI:-0.02–2.00) and higher frequency of foot care days per week (0.50; 95%CI 0.06–0.94). However, there were no differences between the groups regarding diabetes-related distress, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, or the other self-care domains. The results showed only limited benefits for people with T2D, the findings suggest the need for better targeting of interventions and strategies to improve engagement and participation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Welten et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: