Retrospective cohort study finds lower neighborhood socioeconomic status increases heart failure readmissions in municipal hospital patients, indicating a need for targeted neighborhood interventions.
BACKGROUND: Neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) is associated with heart failure (HF) outcomes but has not been investigated within a municipal public health system. OBJECTIVES: The authors assessed the relationships between nSES index and HF-specific or all-cause hospital readmissions and all-cause mortality. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective electronic medical record-based cohort study of adults with International Classification of Diseases-9 or -10 diagnosis of HF; geocoded residential address; and index HF admission within a municipal public health system between January 2001 and September 2019. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used for time-to-event analyses. Fine-Gray Survival models were adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, substance use, guideline-directed medical therapy, and 30-day outpatient follow-up with random effects to account for correlation within census tracts. RESULTS: Among 2,440 individuals, the median age was 60.8 years (SD 14.8 years), 33.6% (821/2,440) were females, and 35.7% (870/2,440) self-identified as Black. The median follow-up time was 38.1 months (IQR: 16.2-74.1 months). The lowest nSES quintile had a 62% higher HF readmission risk (HR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.09 to 2.41; P = 0.018) and 54% higher all-cause readmission risk (HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.17-2.02; P = 0.002) over 1 year than the highest nSES quintile. nSES was not associated with all-cause mortality. Geographic "hotspots" of index HF hospitalizations or all-cause readmissions occurred in neighborhoods disproportionately affected by historical redlining policies and single-room occupancy units. CONCLUSIONS: Lower nSES is associated with higher HF-specific and all-cause readmission within a municipal hospital system. Future research should focus on improving HF morbidity for readmission "hotspot" neighborhoods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: