Qualitative study reveals discrimination and communication barriers during hospitalization of adults with intellectual disabilities, highlighting the need for systemic healthcare reforms.
BACKGROUND: Community stakeholders play a crucial role in supporting the wellbeing of people with intellectual disabilities, including during hospitalisation. This study explored community stakeholder perceptions of the barriers to safe and equitable hospital care for adults with intellectual disabilities in Aotearoa New Zealand. METHOD: = 38) were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis within an interpretive description framework. RESULTS: Four themes were generated: experiencing the hospital as unsafe due to structural and interpersonal discrimination; communication breakdowns that undermine care and amplify distress; distress misread as behavioural issues; and stakeholders becoming the default safety net. Across themes, discrimination emerged as the underlying mechanism shaping patient safety, communication practices, behavioural interpretations, and reliance on stakeholder vigilance. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the need for systems-level change, including improved training on working with people with intellectual disabilities, enhanced communication practices, and strengthened continuity of care to support equitable hospital experiences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donkin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: