Computational modeling demonstrates accurate imputation of missing thermal and magnetic properties in shape-memory alloys, suggesting a path to enhance materials science databases.
Magnetic shape memory alloys based on the Ni–Mn–Ga system are of strategic interest for aerospace and robotics applications due to their ability to respond to both thermal and magnetic stimuli. However, the NASA Shape Memory Materials Database a key resource for the community exhibits significant gaps in functional parameters, with up to 93.7% of records missing critical properties such as the Curie temperature, and over 88% lacking complete magnetic data. To address this limitation, this study proposes a data imputation strategy based on a stacking ensemble comprising twelve machine learning models (LGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost, GradientBoosting, RandomForest, MLP, BayesianRidge, KNN, SVR, GPR, MICE, and AutoEncoder), optimized via Optuna and evaluated using ten random seeds with 10 repetitions each. The approach was applied to reconstruct missing entries in NASA’s database. For heat treatment 1, the method achieved coefficients of determination (R2) of 0.95 for duration (h) and 0.88 for temperature (°C), respectively. For the phase transformation temperatures (Mf, Ms, As, and Af), the method yielded R2 values of 0.83, 0.82, 0.79, and 0.80, respectively. Magnetic properties saturation magnetization and maximum magnetic field were imputed with an R2 of 0.92. In contrast, the Curie temperature exhibited limited predictive performance (R2 = 0.15–0.35), primarily due to insufficient data availability. Overall, the proposed methodology integrates machine learning based imputation with physically supported constraints, providing a viable alternative to enhance the completeness and utility of materials databases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diaz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: