Historical analysis reveals how the Colombian Truth Commission advanced the recognition of exile, highlighting methodological shifts and ongoing reparation challenges.
The article analyses the exile work of the 2018–2022 Commission for the Clarification of Truth, Coexistence and Non‐Repetition (Comisión para el Esclarecimiento de la Verdad, la Convivencia y la No Repetición — CEV). It situates the CEV's work in relation to earlier official reports, state‐led analyses and civil society initiatives in Colombia. It also examines how exile has been conceptualised, rendered visible or marginalised historically across these various frameworks, from the period of bipartisan violence to the CEV's recent work. It focuses on the conceptual and methodological innovations introduced by the CEV, including its transnational approach, the establishment of an international team, and the production of a dedicated volume as part of its Final Report. It argues that the CEV marks a turning point in the recognition of exile and contextualises the Commission's work against the background of previous commissions and reports. It also highlights the challenges that remain in terms of acknowledgement and reparation within national and regional debates on exile in Latin America.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moreno et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: