Theoretical analysis demonstrates inevitable naked singularities across infinite spacetime manifolds, indicating Cosmic Censorship reflects anthropic bias rather than fundamental law.
This paper challenges Roger Penrose’s Weak and Strong Cosmic Censorship Hypotheses, demonstrating that the assumption that reality inherently hides gravitational singularities behind event horizons is not an ontological law, but rather an epistemological artifact driven by anthropic survival and selection bias. By applying the Infinite Realization Principle, the work proves that over an unbounded domain (N → ∞), any physically permitted non-prohibited state ($p > 0$) is mathematically guaranteed to occur. Consequently, unless a physical theory provides an absolute, hard structural prohibition against naked singularities, their macroscopic manifestation across an infinite spacetime manifold is an inevitability rather than an impossibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sagar Kapadia (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: