Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrochemical study demonstrates efficient conversion of furfural to furoic acid using a CoFe@NiFe heterostructure, highlighting a scalable pathway for continuous-flow biomass valorization.
Electrocatalytic oxidation of furfural to furoic acid offers a sustainable route for biomass valorization, yet remains challenged by sluggish kinetics and limited stability. Herein, a hierarchical core–shell CoFe@NiFe-LDH/NF heterostructure was fabricated on nickel foam via a hydrothermal-electrodeposition method. Vertically aligned CoFe-LDH nanosheets induce directional growth of NiFe-LDH, and XPS confirms strong electronic interactions and interfacial charge rearrangement. In an H-type cell, the catalyst achieves an overpotential of 540 mV at 100 mA cm–2 with furfural conversion of 84.7%, selectivity of 98.3%, and Faradaic efficiency of 95.1%. In a continuous-flow electrolyzer, it delivers a current of 1.5 A (310 mA cm–2) at 1.45 V with 82.9% conversion and 70.4% selectivity. In situ electrochemical infrared spectroscopy confirms the stepwise oxidation of the furfural C═O bond to carboxyl group (−COOH) and reveals a hydrogen-bond-mediated stabilization mechanism. DFT calculations show that the heterostructure exhibits spin-polarized, narrow-bandgap semimetallic characteristics, with a low furfural adsorption energy (0.617 eV) at the Ni site and interfacial charge transfer (ΔQ = 0.0048 e) upon adsorption. Furthermore, comparison of nucleophilic attack mechanisms reveals that the OH– pathway, despite a higher-energy initial adduct (0.67 eV), is kinetically more favorable than the H2O pathway (which forms a stable diol intermediate at −1.29 eV) because it requires only two strongly exothermic dehydrogenation steps instead of three.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: