Case analysis uncovers ethical and legal risks of water testing technologies in low-resource settings, highlighting the need for decolonial participatory regulation.
Infectious diseases such as cholera remain pressing global health challenges that are deeply entangled with poverty, increasing climate change, and fragile health infrastructures. While their epidemiology and treatment are well studied, less attention has been paid to the ethical-legal questions that arise when novel medical technologies are introduced in low-resource settings. This article uses a case study on the use of water testing technologies in Nigeria to demonstrate how such gaps generate not only individual but also collective risks, including effects of stigmatisation, ambiguity of responsibility and dynamics of technological dependency. Considering these critical issues, a new regulatory framework is needed to overcome the limitations of conventional regulatory approaches. It proposes a decolonial approach that integrates international standards, human rights and a greater focus on power dynamics and meaningful and locally grounded participatory approaches in the democratisation of medical technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaudenzi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: