Comparative study evaluates outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants versus aspirin after ventricular tachycardia ablation, highlighting optimal antithrombotic management.
Key Points
To compare clinical efficacy and safety outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and aspirin in patients following ventricular tachycardia ablation.
Assessed post-procedural antithrombotic regimens comparing direct oral anticoagulants against aspirin therapy in patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation.
Clinical outcomes and post-procedure complication rates were evaluated between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants and those receiving aspirin.
Therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles were characterized to inform optimal antithrombotic selection following catheter ablation.