Computational study reveals a lower-barrier isomerization pathway in 8-membered cyclic azobenzenes compared to 9-membered rings, explaining their superior light-driven switching efficiency.
The current computational study, mostly based on the Mixed-Reference Spin-Flip Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory (MRSF-TDDFT) method, investigates two experimentally well-studied azobenzene-based photoswitches. The study highlights the differences in the photo-isomerization pathways of the 9-membered and 8-membered 2,2′-linked heteroatom-bridged cyclic azobenzene (AZB) systems, designated as R-AZB–(CH2–X–CH2) and AZB–(CH2–X) (where R = tert-butyl, H and X = S, O), respectively. As we move from the 9-membered to the 8-membered system, the stable ground state isomer switches from trans to cis. In R-AZB–(CH2–X–CH2), the strongly allowed S0–S2 transition from the trans-ground state predominantly populates the S2 state. This subsequently relaxes through the rotational and planar S2 minima. The latter minimum, a possible fluorescent geometry, appears along the N=N stretching mode, and it is connected to the S2/S1-conical intersection (CI) channel. The relaxation pathway along the S1 surface passes through a minimum and torsional S0/S1–CI to form the cis-photoproduct. A barrier of 4 kcal/mol has been detected along this path. In contrast, the forward isomerization of AZB–(CH2–X) initiates through equally allowed S0–S1 and S0–S2 transitions from the cis-ground state. No energy minimum (on the S2 or S1 surface) has been noticed along this cis → trans isomerization path, and a low barrier (∼1 kcal/mol) path leading to the S0/S1–CI has been identified. These indicate a comparatively more efficient isomerization pathway in the 8-membered ring system, which is in line with their reported superior photo-switching ability. In both cases, the reverse photo-isomerization pathways are barrierless. These reverse isomerization pathways corresponding to the thermal processes have also been investigated in this study for both these systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: