Retrospective cohort study reveals improved survival and clear resection rates in locally recurrent rectal cancer, indicating advances in surgical techniques and multidisciplinary care.
Background Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) remains a complex condition associated with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate long-term trends in the management of and oncological outcomes for patients with LRRC treated in a Dutch tertiary referral center. Methods All consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of a first LRRC undergoing curative-intent surgical resection at our referral center between 2000 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were trends in overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), clear (R0) resection rate, and postoperative complication rates. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to visualize changes in these outcomes over time. Secondary endpoints included temporal changes in prognostic factors associated with improved OS and DFS. Results A total of 560 patients undergoing curative-intent surgical resection were included. Over time, patients presented with more comorbidities ( p < 0.001), more multifocal disease ( p < 0.001), and synchronous metastasis ( p < 0.001). The R0 resection rate improved from 59% to 78% over the study period ( p < 0.001). CUSUM analyses demonstrated an upward trend in OS and DFS, indicating a cumulative improvement in survival relative to the reference survival probability. In univariable Cox regression, the most recent time period (2018–2023) was significantly associated with improved OS (hazard ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.58–0.97; p = 0.030). Conclusions Over the past two decades, the outcomes of patients undergoing curative-intent treatment for LRRC have steadily improved. This may reflect advances in diagnostics, neoadjuvant therapy, surgical technique and perioperative care, centralization of care, and patient selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerckhove et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: