Cohort validation study demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for an artificial intelligence CTAC pipeline across clinical cohorts, indicating utility in early cancer detection.
Background/Objectives: Circulating tumor-associated cells (CTACs) are rare among peripheral blood nucleated cells (PBNCs), creating a challenge for image-based multi-cancer detection. We evaluated a predefined CTAC-detection pipeline incorporating Attention U-Net segmentation, post-processing, cytological feature extraction, and Random Forest classification. Methods: Model suitability was explored in asymptomatic individuals and patients with advanced solid tumors. Clinical performance was assessed in a case–control cohort of therapy-naive stage I/II cancers, benign conditions, and asymptomatic individuals, followed by four prospective cohort evaluations performed within the same laboratory and imaging workflow: recurrent cancer with low radiological tumor burden, peri-operative solid tumors, suspected cancer, and asymptomatic screening. PBNCs were stained with EpCAM/Hoechst 33342 and imaged. Pathologists’ review established ground truth annotations. Results: The model had 90.68% sensitivity and 99.53% specificity in the exploratory study. In the case–control cohort, sensitivity was 88.65% in therapy-naive stage I/II cancers, while specificity was 78.95% in benign conditions and >99.9% in asymptomatic individuals. In the prospective cohorts, CTAC detection sensitivity was 91.96% in pretreated low tumor burden cases; CTACs were detected in 100% of pre-surgery specimens and 29.41% of post-surgery specimens; and in suspected cancer cases, the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were 96.34% and 32.35%, respectively. In the asymptomatic screening cohort, 44/7183 participants were CTAC-positive; 16 had confirmed Stage I/II cancer, 10 had no radiologically detectable disease at the available assessment, and 18 remained unresolved. The conservative lower-bound PPV was 36.36%, and the NPV was 99.97%; estimates remain provisional pending complete follow-up. Conclusions: The integrated Attention U-Net/feature-based classification pipeline demonstrated consistent CTAC detection across the evaluated cohorts and supports its potential clinical utility for cancer detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cristofanilli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: