Action-research study demonstrates a co-designed stakeholder framework across six European regions, highlighting improved multi-level governance for sustainable urban development.
Purpose This paper presents and discusses the process employed to co-design and implement a participatory methodology for fostering multi-stakeholder governance within a European Interreg project, named UrbanCOOP. It aims to show how a stakeholder-oriented approach can be operationalized through co-created tools and routines that help regional and local authorities work with their stakeholders on sustainable urban cooperation. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts an action-research design within the Interreg Europe UrbanCOOP project, involving six European regions. The methodology was developed in two main phases: a co-design phase, leading to the co-construction of a stakeholder assessment template (SAT); a joint implementation phase, including progressive stakeholder mapping. Findings The methodology provides a structured process for organizing stakeholder relationships in multi-level governance. It supports continuous engagement rather than one-off consultations, serves as a legitimation tool, functions as a prioritization mechanism by clarifying which stakeholders must be involved and how and broadens the spectrum of actors considered relevant to urban policies. Research limitations/implications The study is based mainly on self-reported data from project partners and on a single Interreg Europe experience with six regions. Future research could test and adapt the methodology in other urban and non-European contexts, apply quantitative analyses to the produced data and follow the longer-term institutionalization of the routines. Originality/value The paper offers an empirically grounded and adaptable methodological framework that enriches multi-level governance by operationalizing key theoretical pillars of the stakeholder approach, such as stakeholder empowerment and engagement, into the everyday work of institutional bodies at the European level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Civera et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: