Registry cohort study reveals low surgery rates in conservatively managed elderly macro-NFPA patients, suggesting initial visual defects drive intervention.
Purpose To investigate adenoma progression, pituitary function, visual impairment, and need for later surgery in elderly patients with conservatively managed nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas (macro-NFPAs). Methods Patients ≥ 65 years in the Swedish Pituitary Registry diagnosed 1991–2023 with macro-NFPA and a decision for conservative management were included ( n = 673, 38% females). Data at diagnosis and at 1- and 5-year follow-up, defined as assessments closest to 1 year (0.5–<2.5) and 5 years (2.5–<7.5), were retrieved. Surgery was recorded up to 7.5 years. Variables included adenoma size, pituitary function, visual impairment, and surgery. Patients were stratified into age groups 65–72, 73–80, and ≥ 81 years. Results At diagnosis, mean age was 76 years, females were older ( p < 0.001). Mean adenoma diameter and volume were 20 mm and 3067 mm³. Visual field defects and reduced visual acuity were seen in 20% and 12%, with no sex differences. Males had more hormone deficiencies (45% vs. 33%, p < 0.01). Hormone deficiencies and visual impairments increased with age ( p < 0.001). The oldest subgroup had the largest adenomas ( p < 0.01), with females having larger tumours ( p < 0.05) and males more deficiencies ( p < 0.05). Adenoma size, hormone deficiencies, and visual impairments remained stable over time within each age group. 6.7% underwent surgery during follow-up. In regression analyses, later surgery was associated with visual field defects at diagnosis ( p < 0.05) but not with adenoma size. Conclusion Pituitary surgery was uncommon in conservatively managed elderly patients with macro-NFPAs. Baseline visual field defects, but not tumour size, were associated with subsequent surgery, supporting regular individualised follow-up in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jerning et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: