Preclinical study demonstrates that paeonol-loaded composite hydrogel repairs UV-induced skin photoaging in mice, indicating a promising strategy for targeted topical skin rejuvenation.
Skin photoaging is closely associated with oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, and dysregulated collagen metabolism. Paeonol (Pae) possesses antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities; however, its poor water solubility and short skin retention time limit its topical application. In this study, a transdermal delivery system based on a carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS)/Carbomer 940 (Carb940) composite gel loaded with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes of paeonol (Pae-CD) was developed. Pae-CD was prepared using an ultrasound-assisted saturated aqueous solution method, and the physicochemical properties, sustained-release behavior, transdermal permeation, antioxidant activity, and safety of Pae-CD/gel were evaluated. Furthermore, a mouse model of skin photoaging induced by combined ultraviolet A (UVA)/ultraviolet B (UVB) irradiation was established to investigate its reparative effects in vivo. The results showed that Pae-CD/gel exhibited a homogeneous three-dimensional porous structure, favorable sustained-release characteristics, enhanced skin retention capacity, and good cellular compatibility. In vivo experiments demonstrated that Pae-CD/gel markedly ameliorated ultraviolet-induced skin dryness, abnormal epidermal thickening, and dermal collagen loss. It also reduced oxidative stress and inflammatory factor levels, down-regulated matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) expression, and promoted the restoration of collagen type I (COL-1) and hydroxyproline (HYP) levels. Systemic safety evaluation revealed no obvious toxicity. In summary, Pae-CD/gel exerts antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects and regulates collagen metabolism by enhancing transdermal delivery and local retention, thereby providing a safe and effective topical delivery strategy for the repair of skin photoaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: