Spatial analysis reveals rising morphological polycentricity alongside shifting expansion drivers across 16 prefecture-level cities, indicating evolving regional land-use patterns.
Rapid urban expansion reshapes urban morphology and the spatial organization of regional city systems. However, provincial-scale studies rarely integrate expansion dynamics, morphological change, and the evolution of morphological polycentricity, while stage-specific shifts in associated factors remain insufficiently understood. This study examines 16 prefecture-level cities in Shandong, China, from 2000 to 2020 to quantify urban expansion and morphological change, assess morphological polycentricity and the city-size hierarchy, and evaluate stage-specific factors associated with newly added built-up land. Built-up land was extracted from the Prolonged Artificial nighttime-light Dataset of China (PANDA-China) using a statistics-constrained bisection threshold method and evaluated against independent land-cover products, followed by complementary spatial, morphological, rank–size, and GeoDetector analyses. The results show that the built-up area increased from 1912.10 to 5646.04 km2 in Shandong, while the annualized expansion rate declined from 7.09%/yr to 4.14%/yr despite persistently high absolute expansion after 2010. The dominant northeast–southwest axis remained stable, while urban forms became less compact and more complex. Secondary built-up nodes strengthened, whereas Jinan and Qingdao retained their dominant positions, indicating strengthening morphological polycentricity within a persistent dual-core structure. GeoDetector revealed a temporal shift from greater GDP prominence in 2000–2010 toward stronger population and road associations in 2010–2020. Initial built-up density remained the strongest explanatory factor, and factor interactions consistently exceeded individual explanatory power. These findings clarify the stage-dependent evolution of urban expansion and support differentiated land management and coordinated regional development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: