Mixed-methods comparative study finds financing access correlates with 30% higher productivity in rice smallholders, highlighting the necessity of integrated hybrid financing models.
Purpose This study develops a context-specific hybrid financing framework for rice agribusiness among smallholder farmers in South Sulawesi (Indonesia) and Sabah (Malaysia) and examines its contribution to financial inclusion. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods approach combined survey data from 150 rice farmers with qualitative interviews involving 20 key stakeholders. Descriptive, comparative and thematic analyses were used to examine financing patterns, institutional barriers, farmer preferences and financing challenges. Findings Access to formal finance remains constrained by collateral requirements, high interest rates and bureaucratic procedures. Farmers with financing access reported average productivity approximately 30% higher than non-financed farmers across both study regions. However, given the cross-sectional design, these differences should be interpreted as associations rather than causal relationships. Qualitative findings emphasized the importance of institutional coordination, financial literacy and digital readiness in improving financing accessibility. Research limitations/implications The study was limited to two rice-producing regions and relied on cross-sectional data. Future research should apply longitudinal or experimental approaches across broader geographical settings. Social implications The framework supports financial inclusion and community-based financing for smallholder farmers. Originality/value This study proposes a context-specific hybrid financing framework integrating public funding, formal finance, Islamic finance, cooperatives and digital financial services within a single conceptual structure for rice agribusiness development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zulkifli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: