Key result
Greater height is linked to in-flight G-LOC, with affected aircrew averaging ~7 cm taller.
Why the study?
G-induced loss of consciousness remains a hazard in high-performance aviation, and individual physiological and operational factors influencing susceptibility during flight needed to be identified and characterised.
What anthropometric and operational factors are associated with in-flight G-induced loss of consciousness in military aircrew?
Case-Control (n=75)
What anthropometric and operational factors are associated with in-flight G-induced loss of consciousness in military aircrew?
Mean Difference: 7 (95% CI 2.89–11.01)
Absolute Event Rate: 183.8% vs 176.8%
p-value: p=0.003
Taller stature and specific operational factors, such as directly controlling the aircraft, are associated with an increased risk of in-flight G-induced loss of consciousness in military aircrew.
May warrant stature consideration in military aircrew G-LOC risk assessment; leaves open causality and requires prospective validation.
Introduction G-induced loss of consciousness (G-LOC) remains a significant hazard in high-performance aviation. Although protective equipment and anti-G straining manoeuvres improve tolerance to high +Gz acceleration, individual physiological and operational factors may influence susceptibility to G-LOC during flight. The aim of this study was to characterise in-flight G-LOC cases and to identify potential factors associated with these events. Methods This retrospective case-control study analysed all in-flight G-LOC events reported among Israeli Air Force cadets and fighter aircrew between 2015 and 2025. For each case, four controls matched for age and squadron were randomly selected without a history of G-LOC. Variables included anthropometric characteristics, resting blood pressure, operational role during the manoeuvre, flight training stage, G-levels at the time of G-LOC, incapacitation duration and preceding symptoms. Results Fifteen in-flight G-LOC events occurring in 13 individuals were identified. The mean age at the time of the event was 23.4±5.6 years. The mean incapacitation duration was 19.6±9.9 s. Visual symptoms preceded loss of consciousness in 73% of events. G-LOC cases were significantly taller than matched controls (183.8±6.3 cm vs 176.8±3.3 cm, 95% CI 2.89 to 11.01, p=0.003). Within the G-LOC cohort, higher G-levels at the time of G-LOC were observed during events in which the affected pilot was directly controlling the aircraft. Among cadets, G-level at the time of G-LOC was positively correlated with training stage (Spearman ρ=0.74, p=0.014). Conclusions These findings provide observational data suggesting that anthropometric and operational factors may influence the conditions under which G-LOC occurs during flight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harel et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in G-induced loss of consciousness (G-LOC) (n=75). G-LOC cases vs. Matched controls without G-LOC was evaluated on Height (cm) (95% CI 2.89-11.01, p=0.003). Aircrew experiencing in-flight G-LOC were significantly taller than matched controls without G-LOC (183.8 cm vs 176.8 cm; 95% CI 2.89-11.01; p=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: