Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Machine learning evaluation demonstrates high seismic detection accuracy using wavelet scattering and support vector machines, indicating a lightweight alternative to deep learning.
Southeastern Spain is a region of moderate-to-high seismic risk, where reliable seismic event detection is a prerequisite for earthquake early warning systems. This paper presents a seismic event detection pipeline based on the Wavelet Scattering Transform (WST) with a ZNE component-feature ensemble, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and a Support Vector Machine (SVM), developed for the Valencian Community Seismic Network (SISCOVA) in Spain. The pipeline is evaluated on a local dataset of labeled three-component traces spanning January 2025 through mid-March 2026 and benchmarked against a classical recursive STA/LTA detector and three state-of-the-art pretrained deep learning models evaluated in a zero-shot transfer setting. Under known signal-to-noise ratio conditions, the proposed approach achieves an accuracy and F1-score of 98.82%, outperforming both the STA/LTA baseline and all evaluated deep learning models. Qualitative validation on continuous full-day recordings from the SISCOVA network further confirms its operational viability. These results demonstrate that WST-based feature extraction, combined with classical machine learning, provides an effective and computationally efficient alternative for seismic event detection in local seismic networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perdomo-Campos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: