Why the study?
Does a standardised forced diuresis regime safely prevent clot retention and what are its metabolic consequences in patients following prostatectomy?
Does a standardised forced diuresis regime safely prevent clot retention and what are its metabolic consequences in patients following prostatectomy?
Forced diuresis is effective in preventing clot retention after prostatectomy, but frequently causes hyponatraemia, likely due to glycine absorption during transurethral resection.
Alerts to hyponatremia risk with forced diuresis post-prostatectomy; leaves open need for randomized safety trials.
The efficacy and metabolic consequences of a standardised forced diuresis regime following prostatectomy were studied in three parts. A retrospective review of 372 patients. A detailed prospective study of blood and urine electrolyte changes in 25 patients. A prospective study of urinary oxalate levels in 15 patients. The regime was effective in safely preventing post-operative clot retention. In 54% of patients the plasma sodium fell below 135 mmol/l. Hypokalaemia was mild and transient except in patients on long-term diuretics. There was a significant per-operative fall in serum calcium levels. It was concluded that forced diuresis is a safe and effective method of reducing clot retention following prostatectomy. The high incidence of post-operative hyponatraemia suggests that absorption of glycine solution at transurethral prostatectomy is a common occurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malone et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: