Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Iron oxide-based porous solids were prepared by a sol−gel process using Fe(III) salts in various solvents. It was observed that the addition of propylene oxide to Fe(III) solutions resulted in the formation of transparent red-brown monolithic gels. The resulting gels were converted to either xerogels by atmospheric drying or aerogels by supercritical extraction with CO 2 (l). Some of the dried materials were characterized by nitrogen adsorption and desorption analysis and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The results of those analyses indicate that the materials have high surface areas (∼300−400 m 2 /g), pore sizes with mesoporic dimensions (2−23 nm), and a microstructure made up of 5−10 nm diameter clusters of iron(III) oxide. The dependence of both gel formation and its rate was studied by varying the epoxide/Fe(III) ratio, the Fe(III) precursor salt, amount of water (H 2 O/Fe(III)) present, and the solvent employed. All of these variables were shown to affect the rate of gel formation and provide a convenient control of this parameter. Finally, an investigation of the mechanism of Fe 2 O 3 gel formation was performed. Both pH and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies suggest that the added epoxide acts as an irreversible proton scavenger that induces the Fe(III) species to undergo hydrolysis and condensation to form an inorganic iron oxide framework. This method can be extended to prepare other transition- and main-group metal oxide materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gash et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: