Why the study?
What are the risks and long-term outcomes of pericardectomy in patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis?
What are the risks and long-term outcomes of pericardectomy in patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis?
Pericardectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis offers good long-term survival and symptomatic improvement, though advanced preoperative disease (NYHA class IV) significantly increases mortality risk.
NYHA IV warrants caution for pericardectomy in constrictive pericarditis; observational data leaves randomized confirmation of survival benefit open.
From 1970 to 1990, 71 consecutive patients (51 men and 20 women) had pericardectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis. The mean age was 44.2 +/- 16.1 years. In the preoperative state 2.8% were in NYHA class I, 18.3% in II, 43.6% in III and 35.2% in IV. The operative approach was median sternotomy in 93% and left anterolateral thoracotomy in 7%. The early mortality rate (within 30 days after operation) was 5.6%. All four early deaths were female (P < 0.001), in the preoperative state the patients were classified as NYHA class IV (P < 0.01). These patients had a significantly higher preoperative mean right atrial pressure then survivors (21.5 +/- 8.5 mmHg vs 13.6 +/- 5.6 mmHg, P < 0.005). Follow-up was obtained for 65 patients (91.5%) and averaged 11 +/- 5.8 years (the longest period was 21.5 years). Actuarial survival at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years for all patients was 84.6% +/- 4.5%, 80.1% +/- 5.3%, 70.5% +/- 6.9% and 65.8% +/- 7.9%, respectively. In the preoperative state 10 of the 12 late deaths (83%) were classified NYHA class IV and the remaining ones class III. Of the 49 patients alive 23% belong to NYHA class I, 42% to II and 35% to III; none is in class IV. Negative predictors of survival were found to be preoperative NYHA class IV (P < 0.01), low-voltage electrocardiogram (ECG) (P < 0.01), ascites (P < 0.01), dyspnea at rest (P < 0.05) and hyperbilirubinemia (P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tirilomis et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: