Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 1, 1997Family Planning Perspectives

Selective Screening for Chlamydial Infection In Women: A Comparison of Three Sets of Criteria

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JMJeanne MarrazzoSt. Vincent's BirminghamDFDavid FineAscensionCCConnie CelumUniversity of Washington

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Marrazzo et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8971f69be9d02581bd6010https://doi.org/10.2307/2953378
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multicenter evaluation of the AntigEnz Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection1992 · 16 citations
  2. 2Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens1993 · 107 citations
  3. 3Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Women: A Need for Universal Screening in High Prevalence Populations?1992 · 85 citations
  4. 4Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections by Direct Immunofluorescence Staining of Genital Secretions1984 · 108 citations
  5. 5Decreased Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Associated With a Selective Screening Program in Family Planning Clinics in Wisconsin1993 · 103 citations