Key result
D-dimer testing in outpatients on oral anticoagulation with suspected DVT (prevalence 18.5%) had a sensitivity of 69.2% (95% CI 42.4-87.3) and negative predictive value of 87.1%.
Why the study?
Does a diagnostic algorithm combining clinical probability and D-dimer accurately exclude deep venous thrombosis in outpatients receiving oral anticoagulation?
Observational (n=70)
Does a diagnostic algorithm combining clinical probability and D-dimer accurately exclude deep venous thrombosis in outpatients receiving oral anticoagulation?
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 69.2% (95% CI 42.4-87.3)
D-dimer testing has limited diagnostic value for excluding DVT in outpatients already receiving oral anticoagulation and should be bypassed in favor of compression venous ultrasound.
D-dimer testing warrants caution for DVT exclusion in anticoagulated outpatients; leaves open optimal diagnostic strategies pending prospective validation.
D-dimer has proved a useful diagnostic tool for the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The objective of this paper was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a diagnostic algorithm combining clinical probability and D-dimer in outpatients receiving oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT) similar to those regularly applied to nonanticoagulated individuals. We enrolled 70 outpatients on OAT who presented with clinically suspected DVT; a standard diagnostic algorithm including clinical evaluation using the modified Wells score and a quantitative immunoturbidimetric D-dimer assay (STA Liatest D-Di; Diagnostica Stago, Asniéres sur Seine, France) was used. A 3-month follow-up period was applied for those patients in whom DVT was initially excluded. The prevalence of DVT was 18.5% (13/70); four of the diagnoses were made during the 3-month follow-up period. The sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of D-dimer were 69.2% (95 confidence interval, 42.4-87.3), 47.4% (95% confidence interval, 35.0-60.1) and 87.1% (95% confidence interval, 71.1-94.9), respectively. In conclusion, D-dimer is of limited value in outpatients on OAT presenting with clinically suspected DVT and should be omitted in such individuals; these patients should always undergo compression venous ultrasound, and repeat ultrasonography within 1 week might be warranted in cases with an initial negative examination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aguilar et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Suspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (n=70). D-dimer assay and modified Wells score was evaluated on Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value) for deep venous thrombosis (Sensitivity 69.2%, 95% CI 42.4-87.3). D-dimer testing in outpatients on oral anticoagulation with suspected DVT (prevalence 18.5%) had a sensitivity of 69.2% (95% CI 42.4-87.3) and negative predictive value of 87.1%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: