Why the study?
When should surgical intervention be performed in patients with acquired valvular heart disease?
When should surgical intervention be performed in patients with acquired valvular heart disease?
This historical review outlines the indications and considerations for surgical intervention in acquired valvular heart disease, emphasizing that surgery is palliative and requires specific approaches based on valve pathology.
The proper time for surgical intervention in the management of acquired valvular defects is frequently difficult to decide. Surgical therapy of this type of heart disease should be regarded as palliative, not curative, even though complete relief of symptoms may occur. Surgical results are best for stenotic, noncalcified valves. The author recommends operation for mitral stenosis when significant obstruction is evidenced by dyspnea or symptoms of pulmonary hypertension; the risk is minimal. Operations on the aortic valve or the incompetent mitral valve require experience and facilities for direct-vision surgery (pump-oxygenator apparatus). A grossly calcified valve needs replacement by a prosthesis; encouraging results have been obtained in this way, but some years will be required for adequate evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Howard B. Burchell (1961) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: