Key result
Surgical safety checklists influence theatre departments through effects on patient safety, teamwork, and communication, but their implementation is often hindered by hierarchical resistance, increased workload, and resource constraints.
Why the study?
Does the Surgical Safety Checklist improve patient outcomes and teamwork in operating theatre departments?
Does the Surgical Safety Checklist improve patient outcomes and teamwork in operating theatre departments?
Surgical safety checklists improve patient outcomes and teamwork, but successful implementation requires addressing staff misconceptions and barriers.
Barriers may limit checklist benefits in practice; leaves open effective strategies to overcome resistance and workload.
The World Health Organisation's Safer Surgery Checklist has become an integral part of standard practice in operating theatres in the UK and other countries. However, some doubts still exist over how much of an effect the checklist actually has, with some staff feeling some resentment towards it. This review explores the literature regarding the impact of the checklist on theatre departments and how this can inform practice. The evidence found shows that use of the checklist reduces patient morbidity and mortality, improves communication and teamwork, reduces operating time and can reduce theatre costs. The negative perceptions that surround the checklist arise from misconceptions and lack of understanding and can result in poor compliance. Further research is required across all areas but with a focus on education and implementation of strategies that address existing barriers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Victoria Cadman (2016) conducted a review in Surgical procedures. Surgical Safety Checklists was evaluated. Surgical safety checklists influence theatre departments through effects on patient safety, teamwork, and communication, but their implementation is often hindered by hierarchical resistance, increased workload, and resource constraints.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: